Romeo & Juliet if Shakespeare had a lobotomy
Director: Chris Weitz
Notable Cast: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, Billy Burke, Michael Sheen, Dakota Fanning
In the latter part of this decade Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight series has staked its claim on our culture; just as Star Trek, Star Wars, and Harry Potter have done. Moms and daughters around the world have fallen under the spell of a teenage harlequin romance with supernatural elements. The series of four novels centers on an 18-year-old girl named Bella and her opining love for a 109-year-old vampire, Edward. That’s right – a vampire. When the first film, Twilight, came out last year I couldn’t understand the hysteria surrounding the release. And after watching New Moon, I still don’t.
Stripped down to its core, this love story between Bella and Edward is Romeo & Juliet for a new generation. Sadly, Stephenie Meyer is no William Shakespeare. The narrative is as thin as angel hair pasta. The dialogue is laughable, the special effects are shoddy, and the film is supported by an emo college radio soundtrack that will make you want to run a stake through your heart.
These issues will do little to dissuade the Twilight brood. They’ll ignore all the bad points of New Moon, as they sit with eyes transfixed on its two male leads. For women this is pornography without the sex. When one character makes an appearance with shirt removed, young girls and some moms will exalt in adoration with screams that will have the unfortunate men in attendance scampering to put plugs in their ears.
What follows below is not a review intended for the fans of the books, but for those not familiar with the series. Because if they were they would have read harlequin romance prose that is awash with imagery that would make a normal reader’s eyes roll.
“Edward leaning motionlessly against his silver-polished Volvo, like a marble tribute to some forgotten pagan god of beauty.”
When bringing one media into another’s there’s the misguided notion that it must be interpreted to a tee. No clearer is this true than with film and literature. The movie studios know in advance that they have the fans of the book already. Their prime objective is attracting the largest possible audience, even those who have no intention of reading the source material.
New Moon picks up with Bella (Kristen Stewart) turning eighteen. She and Edward (Robert Pattinson) continue the girlfriend-vampi…um, boyfriend game. But that night everything changes. A simple paper cut triggers a chain of events that would soon reveal Bella as an obtuse teenage girl who has a lot of growing up to do.
It may have only been a little blood, but it was enough for Edward to sever the bond of love, fearing he couldn’t be there to protect her always. The problem with this solution is that vampires are on the prowl looking for Bella. With Edward’s exit, she spends endless scenes sulking as pitiful songs play in the background. (Face it, Bella; he’s just not that into you.) Then one day she is rescued by Jacob (Taylor Lautner), the long-haired, American Indian boy who has always held a deep love for Bella. As their friendship – maybe more – strengthens, Jacob discovers a fondness for howling at full moons. Yep, he’s a werewolf. To add to the intrigue, Bella receives word of Edward and the grave mistake he’s about to make. And, oh, Jacob likes to go vampire-hunting – can’t forget that. Now Bella’s caught between someone who is cold to the touch and another that will keep her warm at night. It’s the Capulets and the Montigues but with supernatural creatures! What is a girl to do?
The film would have us choose sides. There’s no question of whom the victor should be. Jacob has the edge in both physique and personality. But there’s the fraction of the audience that are supporters of “Team Edward,” loving his goth look and spray-on abs. But clearly Jacob is a better communicator. With Edward out of the picture, Bella and Jacob have a relationship that obliterates any chemistry she had with Edward in the original. But those who have read New Moon know who she picks in the end; and have also come to grips with Bella’s childish behavior. She rates up there with Frodo from The Lord of the Rings on the worthless meter. Both are integral to their prospective stories, yet both are too dependant on others – making them all the more despicable. (For Frodo, it would take a trip to Sin City to find the balls he had been missing in Middle-Earth.)
Chris Weitz has shown that he can direct a proper adaptation (About a Boy) and a bad one (The Golden Compass). New Moon falls somewhere in the middle with bad pacing – the first hour moves like a glacier – that makes it plodding and a chore to sit through. Take out Edward’s slow-motion walks and the vacant stares he and Bella share, and you could shave off ten minutes. But there’s still a chunk of time devoted to Bella’s lovesickness. She’s a worrisome teen who sees vampirism as the only way to be happy. She would give up her soul to be with Edward for an eternity without the forethought of how others would be affected.
New Moon isn’t without some good moments: Jacob’s development as a character; Oscar nominee Michael Sheen’s (The Queen) cameo as a head vampire; and the second act which, while wrought with teenage romance contrivances, makes for a serviceable romantic arc.
Above I mentioned some of the major faults of the film, but left out a big one. The idea that vampires sparkle in the sunlight is one of the “vampire rules” that should not be changed. It would be like if Han Solo shot second instead of first.
Fans will embrace the film’s presentation, remembering only Robert Pattinson in a Hugh Hefner robe and Taylor Lautner’s 8-pack abs as they leave the theater. Those who are already detractors of vampire chick lit, and flip the channel whenever a story on the Twilight phenomenon airs, this movie won’t convert them. Consider yourself saved from the fang.

“Fans will embrace the film’s presentation, remembering only Robert Pattinson in a Hugh Hefner robe and Taylor Lautner’s 8-pack abs as they leave the theater.”
And those are pretty much the only reasons I’m going to see it. In about an hour.
I don’t expect much, just laughable dialogue, shoddy effects, and an emo soundtrack. Sounds like I’m going to love it!
I’m glad you went to see this boss and not me.
A very cool trailer. Can’t wait to watch it on screen.
Oh man i have been waiting for this movie for a long time, still can`t wait too see it.
I’m pretty sure this series has set back feminism a good thirty or more years.
Only 30 years? That’s being conservative on your estimate…..the whole series is about how a woman needs a man or else she shouldn’t exist. Heck, dude stalks her and that’s somehow romantic because he “glitters.” But then again, look at the audience for this thing….its either a pedophile’s wet dream or Jenny Craig’s worst nightmare, no in-between.
Why is it you guys have to hate on this? Are you jealous of the Edward influence? Hmmmmm??
Fans of Twilight don’t have to be overweight emo teenage girls, pedophiles, or Jenny Craig. How about I just make a blanket statement and say that people who like action movies are just knuckle dragging Neaderthals with poor judgement in movies?
So, Jenny, are you trying to say that action movies are so easy that “even a caveman can do it”?
Off the top of my head, I can’t remember a single line of memorable dialogue in Twilight: New Moon. But I can’t think of quite a few in action cinema.
“For once, I’d like to hear you scream in pain.”
“Play some rap music.”
“Who’s driving this car – Stevie Wonder?”
“Chefs do that.”
“Winners go home and fuck the prom queen.”
“What’s with Dictionary Boy over here?”
“I think you mean Thesaurus Boy.”
Me neanderthal? That unpossible!
God knows I like my share of bad movies, but something about Twilight just sets me off. But if you like it, Jenny, just to see hunky guys not wearing shirts, then I fully support your right. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go watch some scantily-clad women doing, um, something. I don’t really know the movie’s plot, but that’s really beside the point
Jenny, I never implied that Twilight fans are just those types you mentioned. But it truly is a horrible franchise and incredibly lame. Few examples:
Vampires – they have taken every single thing vampires have been known for in history and DESTROYED that.
Werewolves – those are not werewolves as they imply, they are just wolves.
Edward – the dude who plays him is a talentless hack
Bella – my God, she is horrible
Story – vampires versus werewolves would be an awesome plot to begin with but they totally screwed it up and then decided to add a lame love story (and no not all love stories are lame) into it.
Twilight blows.
Bro…the main vampire guy is a stalker. He watches her when he sleeps, been following her around for a while…if it wasn’t the fact that he’s so “pretty” she should’ve filed a restraining order against the creep. Plus he tells her he’s been thinking about killing her, too…and it’s ok? Its like a bad country song.
Plus don’t you think it’s a bit creepy she’s worried about getting “older” then him when he’s past 100?
[...] seen the new trailer for Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief if you attended New Moon this weekend. If you weren’t one of the ones who contributed to that film’s 140.7 [...]
@ Danny – You have every right to think it’s incredibly lame. Lots of people think that way. But don’t hate on us for liking it. I also understand all of those arguements you gave. Allow me to reciprocate:
Vampires – I don’t even think of them as vampires. They’re supposed to be “scary” at certain points in the movie, but they’re not. They’re just extra pretty people that happen to be immortal.
Werewolves – I’ll give you that, they’re not really werewolves either. But in the context of the story, that doesn’t really matter. He’s just a hulking dude with muscles who just so happens to be immortal as well.
Edward – The dude who plays him is a talentless hack. But he’s a very pretty dude who, even though he’s a stalker, just wants the best for Bella. *swoon*
Bella – Yeah, she’s boring and shows absolutely no emotion at all, but she represents the awkward everygirl. You could compare this to The Big Bang Theory where a geeky kid all of a sudden gets attention by someone who would otherwise be WAY out of her/his league.
The love story is cute and innocent enough. Hell, vampires are supposed to be sensual and they barely kiss.
@ Josh – FINALLY someone who gets it!! The plot doesn’t really matter so much as long as you get to watch an attractive member of the opposite sex prance around scantilly clad. Thank you, sir.
@ Travis – Nobody ever said Twilight was well-written.
@ Jenny – You’re probably right about that. But the sad thing is that there are some women who take the Twilight chick lit way too seriously. As if Stephenie Meyer is up there with Jane Austen.
Travis, so what if they take it too seriously.
Men have a long history of taking silly things too seriously (super heroes, wrestling, the three stooges).
Why can’t women enjoy something juvenile every now and then?
There is no difference between the level of literature found in “Twilight” and in an average wrestling script — and this site has a whole section dedicated to ‘rastlin.
Wait-wrestling’s scripted?
Not to this guy:
Wow. Just wow.
Maybe if Freddie Prinze Jr. had written “Twilight” we would have seen more guys getting that emotional about teen vampire love stores — after all, he was such a successful writer for pro wrestling.
from the point of view of someone who really enjoyed the books, i thought New Moon (the movie adaptation) was entertaining, true to the book too
can`t wait to watch it, still hasn`t aired in my country but i am still waiting.
[...] who has some fresh ideas when it comes to termination. Kendrick, it should be noted, was in both Twilight films, yet proves here that she may the most talented fake vampire of the bunch. So I’ll give her [...]